<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
<title>mark.veerman.com</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mark.veerman.com/" />
<modified>2008-02-27T18:52:59Z</modified>
<tagline></tagline>
<id>tag:mark.veerman.com,2008://1</id>
<generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="4.01">Movable Type</generator>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2008, mark</copyright>

<entry>
<title>Star Wars cliff notes</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mark.veerman.com/archives/2008/02/star_wars_cliff.html" />
<modified>2008-02-27T18:52:59Z</modified>
<issued>2008-02-27T18:49:10Z</issued>
<id>tag:mark.veerman.com,2008://1.119</id>
<created>2008-02-27T18:49:10Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Given that James has been on a Star Wars kick recently makes this YouTube video even funnier.



</summary>
<author>
<name>mark</name>

<email>mark@veerman.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>humor</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mark.veerman.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>Given that James has been on a Star Wars kick recently makes this YouTube video even funnier.</p>

<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EBM854BTGL0&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EBM854BTGL0&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>

<div class="clearer"></div>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Al Sharpton&apos;s an ass</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mark.veerman.com/archives/2008/01/al_sharptons_an.html" />
<modified>2008-01-15T13:20:40Z</modified>
<issued>2008-01-11T15:22:00Z</issued>
<id>tag:mark.veerman.com,2008://1.118</id>
<created>2008-01-11T15:22:00Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I should probably leave this alone, but it really bugs me when public figures, notably the Rev. Al Sharpton and the Rev. Jesse Jackson, co-opt someone else&apos;s problem or tragedy as a soap-box for their race and equality issues. It&apos;s very dangerous of me to question their motives, but every ounce of my being thinks their  actions are motivated first by power, greed, and fame, and second for their desire to be a voice for the oppressed and marginalized. I&apos;m not saying that they&apos;re entirely disingenuous, but because their motives are inverted they do more to escalate racial tensions than soothe them.

I was reminded of this opinion when I read this morning on CNN about Golf Channel host, Kelly Tilghman&apos;s, recent gaffe:

Excerpt from the CNN article:
-----------
&quot;Tilghman uttered the remark during coverage of Hawaii&apos;s Mercedes-Benz Championship on Friday, while she and and co-host Nick Faldo were bantering about how young golfers might challenge ever-dominant Woods.

Faldo said, &quot;To take Tiger on, well yeah, they should just gang up for a while until ...&quot;

&quot;Lynch him in a back alley,&quot; Tilghman interrupted with a chuckle.&quot;
-----------

It doesn&apos;t appear to me that this was intended to be racist. It doesn&apos;t point to inner racism coming out in a moment of weakness.  She was just trying to be funny and made an honest mistake.  I am constantly opening my mouth up to say something that I think will be funny or insightful, and realizing the second it&apos;s out of my mouth that it might be inappropriate or hurtful. Just this morning, my wife wanted to sit on the couch, and my daughter wouldn&apos;t move her legs, and even after Courtney told her to, Emma said, &quot;I want you to sit on them.&quot;  In a flash, I said to Emma, &quot;Trust me, you don&apos;t want her to sit on them. Doh! You can bet I got a glare from Courtney. With humor, timing is everything. The faster your can respond, the greater the potential for humor. We don&apos;t always take the time to filter those statements.  Like it or not, my brain has associated certain things, positive and negative, with every race on the planet. At some point in the future my brain may impulse my mouth to say something racially inappropriate before I consider the ramifications. That doesn&apos;t make me a racist, stupid perhaps, but not a racist. Tilghman has since issued a genuine apology to Tiger Woods,

Exerpt from the CNN article:
-----------
who through his agent issued a statement saying he was friends with Tilghman and respected her, said, &quot;We know unequivocally that there was no ill intent in her comments.&quot;
-----------

Apology given, apology accepted, done. If Al Sharpton really cared about social justice and people he would see that the initial public outcry at Tilghman&apos;s comment, her subsequent and genuine apology, and Tiger Woods&apos; forgiveness were information enough that the world doesn&apos;t condone statements like hers, and takes racial inequality very seriously. She&apos;s been suspended, and had her hand slapped, but he wants her fired. What!?

To me, the drunk rantings of Michael Richards and Mel Gibson likely point to repressed feelings and racial hate, but this was a simple mistake -- plain and simple. I know she&apos;s white and all, but demanding she be fired for that mistake seems way overblown. Tilghman is known for professionalism and speaks millions of words per year and six of them are unintentionally hurtful. Give me a break, 80% of the words out of Don Imus&apos; mouth, trying to be funny, could easily be misconstrued and hurtful to someone, but I don&apos;t even think he&apos;s a racist.

It&apos;s not what you say, but how you say it.

Like I said, I should have left this one alone!

[Update: There&apos;s some great continued discussion of this post on a friends blog. Thanks Peter.]

[Update: My brother in law read this post while I was with him, his first comment, even before finishing, was that I may have undermined my position by starting the whole post off by calling the antagonist an ass. While I assumed a certain amount of license in rant mode, he may have a point. Thanks Dan.]</summary>
<author>
<name>mark</name>

<email>mark@veerman.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>misc</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mark.veerman.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>I should probably leave this alone, but it <em>really</em> bugs me when public figures, notably the Rev. Al Sharpton and the Rev. Jesse Jackson, co-opt someone else's problem or tragedy as a soap-box for their race and equality issues. It's very dangerous of me to question their motives, but every ounce of my being thinks their  actions are motivated first by power, greed, and fame, and second for their desire to be a voice for the oppressed and marginalized. I'm not saying that they're entirely disingenuous, but because their motives are inverted they do more to escalate racial tensions than soothe them.</p>

<p>I was reminded of this opinion when <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/01/10/tilghman.woods/index.html">I read this morning on CNN</a> about Golf Channel host, Kelly Tilghman's, recent gaffe:</p>

<p>Excerpt from the CNN article:<br />
-----------<br />
"Tilghman uttered the remark during coverage of Hawaii's Mercedes-Benz Championship on Friday, while she and and co-host Nick Faldo were bantering about how young golfers might challenge ever-dominant Woods.</p>

<p>Faldo said, "To take Tiger on, well yeah, they should just gang up for a while until ..."</p>

<p>"Lynch him in a back alley," Tilghman interrupted with a chuckle."<br />
-----------</p>

<p>It doesn't appear to me that this was intended to be racist. It doesn't point to inner racism coming out in a moment of weakness.  She was just trying to be funny and made an honest mistake.  I am constantly opening my mouth up to say something that I think will be funny or insightful, and realizing the second it's out of my mouth that it might be inappropriate or hurtful. Just this morning, my wife wanted to sit on the couch, and my daughter wouldn't move her legs, and even after Courtney told her to, Emma said, "I want you to sit on them."  In a flash, I said to Emma, "Trust me, you don't want her to sit on them. Doh! You can bet I got a glare from Courtney. With humor, timing is everything. The faster your can respond, the greater the potential for humor. We don't always take the time to filter those statements.  Like it or not, my brain has associated certain things, positive and negative, with every race on the planet. At some point in the future my brain may impulse my mouth to say something racially inappropriate before I consider the ramifications. That doesn't make me a racist, stupid perhaps, but not a racist. Tilghman has since issued a genuine apology to Tiger Woods,</p>

<p>Exerpt from the CNN article:<br />
-----------<br />
who through his agent issued a statement saying he was friends with Tilghman and respected her, said, "We know unequivocally that there was no ill intent in her comments."<br />
-----------</p>

<p>Apology given, apology accepted, done. If Al Sharpton really cared about social justice and people he would see that the initial public outcry at Tilghman's comment, her subsequent and genuine apology, and Tiger Woods' forgiveness were information enough that the world doesn't condone statements like hers, and takes racial inequality <b>very</b> seriously. She's been suspended, and had her hand slapped, but he wants her fired. What!?</p>

<p>To me, the drunk rantings of Michael Richards and Mel Gibson likely point to repressed feelings and racial hate, but this was a simple mistake -- plain and simple. I know she's white and all, but demanding she be fired for that mistake seems way overblown. Tilghman is known for professionalism and speaks millions of words per year and six of them are unintentionally hurtful. Give me a break, 80% of the words out of Don Imus' mouth, trying to be funny, could easily be misconstrued and hurtful to someone, but I don't even think <b>he's</b> a racist.</p>

<p><em>It's not what you say, but how you say it.</em></p>

<p>Like I said, I should have left this one alone!</p>

<p>[<b>Update:</b> There's some great continued discussion of this post on <a href="http://clownsofdeath.com/archives/000203.html">a friends blog</a>. Thanks Peter.]</p>

<p>[<b>Update:</b> My brother in law read this post while I was with him, his first comment, even before finishing, was that I may have undermined my position by starting the whole post off by calling the antagonist an ass. While I assumed a certain amount of license in <em>rant</em> mode, he may have a point. Thanks Dan.]</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>1979 Schwinn Spitfire &quot;paperboy&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mark.veerman.com/archives/2008/01/1979_schwinn_sp.html" />
<modified>2008-01-10T20:15:46Z</modified>
<issued>2008-01-10T20:03:35Z</issued>
<id>tag:mark.veerman.com,2008://1.117</id>
<created>2008-01-10T20:03:35Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I got the coolest Christmas present from Courtney this year; actually it was last year, but you know what I mean. She got me 1979 Schwinn Spitfire &quot;paperboy&quot; bike.  In biking circles, it&apos;s called a &quot;Townie.&quot; I&apos;ve been using it to go get a beer with friends, walk our new puppy (I&apos;ll write about her soon), and ride around with the kids.

I&apos;ve been using it without the baskets, but it came with two really cool baskets -- I&apos;m not sure if those were standard or not. Regardless, It&apos;s perfect.  Thanks Courtney!
</summary>
<author>
<name>mark</name>

<email>mark@veerman.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>cycling</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mark.veerman.com/">
<![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mark.veerman.com/gallery/cycling/schwinn_spitfire_no_baskets"><img src="http://mark.veerman.com/gallery/albums/cycling/schwinn_spitfire_no_baskets.thumb.jpg" class="left" border="0" /></a>I got the coolest Christmas present from Courtney this year; actually it was last year, but you know what I mean. She got me 1979 Schwinn Spitfire "paperboy" bike.  In biking circles, it's called a "Townie." I've been using it to go get a beer with friends, walk our new puppy (I'll write about her soon), and ride around with the kids.</p>

<p><a href="http://mark.veerman.com/gallery/cycling/schwinn_spitfire_baskets_angle"><img src="http://mark.veerman.com/gallery/albums/cycling/schwinn_spitfire_baskets_angle.thumb.jpg" class="left" border="0" style="clear: left" /></a>I've been using it without the baskets, but it came with two really cool baskets -- I'm not sure if those were standard or not. Regardless, It's perfect.  Thanks Courtney!<br />
<div class="clearer"></div></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Houdini secrets exposed!</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mark.veerman.com/archives/2008/01/houdini_secrets.html" />
<modified>2008-01-03T17:23:52Z</modified>
<issued>2008-01-02T21:41:28Z</issued>
<id>tag:mark.veerman.com,2008://1.116</id>
<created>2008-01-02T21:41:28Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">A while ago we purchased a fancy wine bottle corkscrew that they sell at Brookstone. The one where one hand holds a clamp around the top of the bottle and the other hand lowers a lever and raises it all in one smooth motion, and voila, the cork is removed with little effort.  Well, the one from Brookstone broke, and since we don&apos;t have a Brookstone handy in the not-so-budding metropolis of Harrisonburg, VA, I decided to just replace it rather than go though the headache of trying to return it.

On the Monday before Christmas, it occurred to me that I should probably get some stocking stuffers for Courtney. So I took the kids to Target and and amidst the kitchen gadgets I saw what seemed to be a reasonable approximation of the Brookstone corkscrew so I bought it. I also bought her a really cool digital meat thermometer that is awesome, but I digress.

Anyway, on Christmas day, I went to use it -- isn&apos;t that great when you get to use someone else&apos;s present -- and proceeded to remove the Houdini from it&apos;s container. As soon as I picked it up, I was struck with how light it was. The one from Brookstone had obvious heft; this one felt like it was made of cheap plastic. I then picked up the box, and it was still rather heavy.  Curious, I ripped off the cardboard backing on the box and found a rock screwed into the back of the plastic.  What&apos;s up with that!?

It appears to me that this rock serves no purpose other than to exaggerate the weight of the corkscrew and thus inflate your perception of it&apos;s quality. It seems to me that this constitutes consumer fraud, and I&apos;m tempted to do something about it, what do you think? Granted, the hefty Brookstone corkscrew without the sleight of hand did break, so in that case weight did not turn out to be an accurate gauge of quality. Regardless, I thought this was pretty curious.



</summary>
<author>
<name>mark</name>

<email>mark@veerman.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>gadgets</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mark.veerman.com/">
<![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mark.veerman.com/gallery/houdini/houdini_front"><img src="http://mark.veerman.com/gallery/albums/houdini/houdini_front.thumb.jpg" class="left"  border="0" /></a>A while ago we purchased a fancy wine bottle corkscrew that they sell at Brookstone. The one where one hand holds a clamp around the top of the bottle and the other hand lowers a lever and raises it all in one smooth motion, and voila, the cork is removed with little effort.  Well, the one from Brookstone broke, and since we don't have a Brookstone handy in the not-so-budding metropolis of Harrisonburg, VA, I decided to just replace it rather than go though the headache of trying to return it.</p>

<p>On the Monday before Christmas, it occurred to me that I should probably get some stocking stuffers for Courtney. So I took the kids to Target and and amidst the kitchen gadgets I saw what seemed to be a reasonable approximation of the Brookstone corkscrew so I bought it. I also bought her a really cool digital meat thermometer that is awesome, but I digress.</p>

<p><a href="http://mark.veerman.com/gallery/houdini/houdini_back_001"><img src="http://mark.veerman.com/gallery/albums/houdini/houdini_back_001.thumb.jpg" class="right"  border="0" /></a>Anyway, on Christmas day, I went to use it -- isn't that great when you get to use someone else's present -- and proceeded to remove the Houdini from it's container. As soon as I picked it up, I was struck with how light it was. The one from Brookstone had obvious heft; this one felt like it was made of cheap plastic. I then picked up the box, and it was still rather heavy.  Curious, I ripped off the cardboard backing on the box and found a rock screwed into the back of the plastic.  What's up with that!?</p>

<p>It appears to me that this rock serves no purpose other than to exaggerate the weight of the corkscrew and thus inflate your perception of it's quality. It seems to me that this constitutes consumer fraud, and I'm tempted to do something about it, what do you think? Granted, the hefty Brookstone corkscrew without the sleight of hand did break, so in that case weight did not turn out to be an accurate gauge of quality. Regardless, I thought this was pretty curious.</p>

<p><a href="http://mark.veerman.com/gallery/houdini/houdini_rock"><img src="http://mark.veerman.com/gallery/albums/houdini/houdini_rock.thumb.jpg" class="left" border="0" /></a></p>

<div class="clearer"></div>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>How the other third lives</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mark.veerman.com/archives/2007/12/how_the_other_h.html" />
<modified>2007-12-03T21:30:13Z</modified>
<issued>2007-12-03T20:24:06Z</issued>
<id>tag:mark.veerman.com,2007://1.114</id>
<created>2007-12-03T20:24:06Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">We&apos;re in the midst of a kitchen remodel. On Saturday, our drywall guy asked me what I did for a living.  I gave him my standard short answer, &quot;I build websites ...&quot; That didn&apos;t get much of a reaction, so I followed that up with &quot;for Amazon.com ...&quot; I could tell that the name didn&apos;t register either, so I just said &quot;I&apos;m a computer programmer; I write software.&quot; His response, &quot;I haven&apos;t really gotten into the whole computer thing.&quot;

Wow, he&apos;s not online, and he doesn&apos;t even own or use a computer.  Here is a successful sub-contractor with a friendly, professional crew who doesn&apos;t use a computer and hadn&apos;t heard of Amazon.

In this Information Week article, found via a quick Google search, in February 2006, only 64% of US households are online. Of the 36% who aren&apos;t online, only 2% have a desire to get online. I don&apos;t really have time to find more recent data, but one can assume that things probably haven&apos;t changed too much.

I&apos;m curious to know how much that demographic has been inadvertently marginalized by the assumption that, &quot;everyone&apos;s online these days.&quot; This was refreshing and a good reminder that we could in fact live healthy and productive lives without computers and the internet. Unless of course you build websites for a living.</summary>
<author>
<name>mark</name>

<email>mark@veerman.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>misc</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mark.veerman.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>We're in the midst of a kitchen remodel. On Saturday, our drywall guy asked me what I did for a living.  I gave him my standard short answer, "I build websites ..." That didn't get much of a reaction, so I followed that up with "for Amazon.com ..." I could tell that the name didn't register either, so I just said "I'm a computer programmer; I write software." His response, "I haven't really gotten into the whole computer thing."</p>

<p>Wow, he's not online, and he doesn't even own or use a computer.  Here is a successful sub-contractor with a friendly, professional crew who <strong>doesn't use a computer and hadn't heard of Amazon</strong>.</p>

<p>In <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=180207781">this Information Week article</a>, found via a quick Google search, in February 2006, only 64% of US households are online. Of the 36% who aren't online, only 2% have a desire to get online. I don't really have time to find more recent data, but one can assume that things probably haven't changed too much.</p>

<p>I'm curious to know how much that demographic has been inadvertently marginalized by the assumption that, "<em>everyone's online these days</em>." This was refreshing and a good reminder that we could in fact live healthy and productive lives without computers and the internet. Unless of course you build websites for a living.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Cory Doctorow on Facebook</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mark.veerman.com/archives/2007/11/cory_doctorow_o.html" />
<modified>2007-11-27T14:37:26Z</modified>
<issued>2007-11-27T14:08:38Z</issued>
<id>tag:mark.veerman.com,2007://1.113</id>
<created>2007-11-27T14:08:38Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I read an article this morning that was interesting. The title doesn&apos;t really do it justice as many of the things that struck me had nothing to do with avoiding old friends.

 How Your Creepy Ex-Co-Workers Will Kill Facebook

&quot;Facebook is no paragon of virtue. It bears the hallmarks of the kind of pump-and-dump service that sees us as sticky, monetizable eyeballs in need of pimping. The clue is in the steady stream of emails you get from Facebook: &quot;So-and-so has sent you a message.&quot; Yeah, what is it? Facebook isn&apos;t telling -- you have to visit Facebook to find out, generate a banner impression, and read and write your messages using the halt-and-lame Facebook interface, which lags even end-of-lifed email clients like Eudora for composing, reading, filtering, archiving and searching. Emails from Facebook aren&apos;t helpful messages, they&apos;re eyeball bait, intended to send you off to the Facebook site, only to discover that Fred wrote &quot;Hi again!&quot; on your &quot;wall.&quot;&quot;

In some cases there might be a &quot;wisdom of crowds,&quot; but the manner in which we consume &quot;social&quot; websites is more reminiscent of a herd of demon-infused pigs about to run off a cliff.

Taken completely out of context, this reminds me of a C.S. Lewis quote, &quot;We are half-hearted creatures, fooling about with drink and sex and ambition when infinite joy is offered us, like an ignorant child who wants to go on making mud pies in a slum because he cannot imagine what is meant by the offer of a holiday at the sea. We are far too easily pleased.&quot;

But then again, until something better comes around Facebook is still my queen, and I think it&apos;s about time to change my status.</summary>
<author>
<name>mark</name>

<email>mark@veerman.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mark.veerman.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>I read an article this morning that was interesting. The title doesn't really do it justice as many of the things that struck me had nothing to do with avoiding old friends.</p>

<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/cmp/20071127/tc_cmp/204203573"> How Your Creepy Ex-Co-Workers Will Kill Facebook</a></p>

<p>"Facebook is no paragon of virtue. It bears the hallmarks of the kind of pump-and-dump service that sees us as sticky, monetizable eyeballs in need of pimping. The clue is in the steady stream of emails you get from Facebook: "So-and-so has sent you a message." Yeah, what is it? Facebook isn't telling -- you have to visit Facebook to find out, generate a banner impression, and read and write your messages using the halt-and-lame Facebook interface, which lags even end-of-lifed email clients like Eudora for composing, reading, filtering, archiving and searching. Emails from Facebook aren't helpful messages, they're eyeball bait, intended to send you off to the Facebook site, only to discover that Fred wrote "Hi again!" on your "wall.""</p>

<p>In some cases there might be a "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisdom_of_crowds">wisdom of crowds</a>," but the manner in which we consume "social" websites is more reminiscent of a herd of demon-infused pigs about to run off a cliff.</p>

<p>Taken completely out of context, this reminds me of a C.S. Lewis quote, "We are half-hearted creatures, fooling about with drink and sex and ambition when infinite joy is offered us, like an ignorant child who wants to go on making mud pies in a slum because he cannot imagine what is meant by the offer of a holiday at the sea. <b>We are far too easily pleased</b>."</p>

<p>But then again, until something better comes around Facebook is still my queen, and I think it's about time to change my status.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Sudo laugh</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mark.veerman.com/archives/2007/11/real_power.html" />
<modified>2007-11-06T12:23:20Z</modified>
<issued>2007-11-05T16:09:24Z</issued>
<id>tag:mark.veerman.com,2007://1.112</id>
<created>2007-11-05T16:09:24Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">For my non-technical friends, who don&apos;t work with unix/linux, this won&apos;t be very funny, but I&apos;ve been laughing about this for days. I don&apos;t know where this image came from, but I ran across it in this article. If you&apos;re curious you can read about sudo on Wikipedia. I can imagine some funny alternatives around the topics of beer or sex.


UPDATE: Topher pointed out that the comic&apos;s author has a website: xkcd.com. I did find this comic in the archives.</summary>
<author>
<name>mark</name>

<email>mark@veerman.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>humor</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mark.veerman.com/">
<![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0 0 10px 0;">For my non-technical friends, who don't work with unix/linux, this won't be very funny, but I've been laughing about this for days. I don't know where this image came from, but I ran across it in <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/10/new-devices-rep.html">this article</a>. If you're curious you can read about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudo"><em>sudo</em> on Wikipedia</a>. I can imagine some funny alternatives around the topics of beer or sex.</p>
<img src="/images/sandwich.png" class="left" />
<div class="clearer"></div>
<div><b>UPDATE:</b> Topher pointed out that the comic's author has a website: <a href="http://xkcd.com" target="_blank">xkcd.com</a>. I did find this comic in <a href="http://xkcd.com/149/" target="_blank">the archives</a>.</div>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Oh really?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mark.veerman.com/archives/2007/10/oh_really.html" />
<modified>2007-10-29T14:51:12Z</modified>
<issued>2007-10-29T14:38:32Z</issued>
<id>tag:mark.veerman.com,2007://1.111</id>
<created>2007-10-29T14:38:32Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I&apos;ve been wanting to take a picture of this sign for about 5 years.  It really makes me laugh.

</summary>
<author>
<name>mark</name>

<email>mark@veerman.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>humor</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mark.veerman.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>I've been wanting to take a picture of this sign for about 5 years.  It really makes me laugh.<br />
<img src="/images/hawk_security.jpg" class="left" /><br />
<div class="clearer"></div></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Gmail supports IMAP!</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mark.veerman.com/archives/2007/10/gmail_supports.html" />
<modified>2007-10-25T22:37:45Z</modified>
<issued>2007-10-25T12:45:15Z</issued>
<id>tag:mark.veerman.com,2007://1.110</id>
<created>2007-10-25T12:45:15Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">At some point this week, Gmail started supporting the IMAP protocol for remote email retrieval.  If you own the iPhone, this is great news.  Back when the only supported protocol was POP, there were only two options: Leave a copy of messages on the server (or not), and remove deleted messages from the server (or not).  You didn&apos;t have access to your labels (aka tags, folders), and all of your email regardless of configured filters, showed up in one big Inbox (thankfully with the exception of the Spam label).  This allowed you to read your email, but not really manage it.

IMAP is true synchronization between a client (iPhone) and a server (Gmail). On the iPhone it gives you access to your labels as IMAP folders, and your Inbox contains what&apos;s truly in your Inbox. You can effectively label an email by moving it to a folder, but it doesn&apos;t seem to be possible to move it to more than one folder so you&apos;re limited to one label per message. All labeling, deletions, and sent items are synchronized with your Gmail account in real time. If you want to access your mail from more than one location via IMAP, the synchronization features make this a lot less error prone. I noticed that if you decide to click cancel when composing a message, it asks you if you want to save it.  If you do save the message it ends up in an iPhone Drafts folder instead of the Gmail Drafts folder, so it won&apos;t be synchronized. I&apos;ve only used it for a day now, but it&apos;s a huge improvement over POP, and makes using my iPhone even cooler.

Update: I found a new label in my list of labels called &quot;[Imap]/Drafts&quot; and in that label was my draft that I had previously saved on my iPhone.</summary>
<author>
<name>mark</name>

<email>mark@veerman.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>iPhone</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mark.veerman.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>At some point this week, Gmail started supporting the IMAP protocol for remote email retrieval.  If you own the iPhone, this is great news.  Back when the only supported protocol was POP, there were only two options: Leave a copy of messages on the server (or not), and remove deleted messages from the server (or not).  You didn't have access to your labels (aka tags, folders), and all of your email regardless of configured filters, showed up in one big Inbox (thankfully with the exception of the Spam label).  This allowed you to read your email, but not really manage it.</p>

<p>IMAP is true synchronization between a client (iPhone) and a server (Gmail). On the iPhone it gives you access to your labels as IMAP folders, and your Inbox contains what's truly in your Inbox. You can effectively label an email by moving it to a folder, but it doesn't seem to be possible to move it to more than one folder so you're limited to one label per message. All labeling, deletions, and sent items are synchronized with your Gmail account in real time. If you want to access your mail from more than one location via IMAP, the synchronization features make this a lot less error prone. I noticed that if you decide to click cancel when composing a message, it asks you if you want to save it.  If you do save the message it ends up in an iPhone Drafts folder instead of the Gmail Drafts folder, so it won't be synchronized. I've only used it for a day now, but it's a huge improvement over POP, and makes using my iPhone even cooler.</p>

<p><b>Update:</b> I found a new label in my list of labels called "[Imap]/Drafts" and in that label was my draft that I had previously saved on my iPhone.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Future pro bikers</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mark.veerman.com/archives/2007/10/future_pro_bikers.html" />
<modified>2007-10-22T16:57:51Z</modified>
<issued>2007-10-22T16:39:34Z</issued>
<id>tag:mark.veerman.com,2007://1.109</id>
<created>2007-10-22T16:39:34Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">This weekend I was out riding bikes with my kids. James learned how to ride over a mulch pile.  He fell the first time, but tried again and nailed it. He also started riding with one hand on the handle bars. Emma decided to start riding off curbs on her own, which is pretty funny since she still uses training wheels. I was really proud of them, and glad that none of their stunts ended  in tears ... this time. I was also thrilled to have my 2 megapixel iPhone with me, which takes pretty good shots.



</summary>
<author>
<name>mark</name>

<email>mark@veerman.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>cycling</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mark.veerman.com/">
<![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mark.veerman.com/gallery/cycling/james_bike_mulch"><img src="http://mark.veerman.com/gallery/albums/cycling/james_bike_mulch.thumb.jpg"  class="left" border="0" /></a>This weekend I was out riding bikes with my kids. James learned how to ride over a mulch pile.  He fell the first time, but tried again and nailed it. He also started riding with one hand on the handle bars. Emma decided to start riding off curbs on her own, which is pretty funny since she still uses training wheels. I was really proud of them, and glad that none of their stunts ended  in tears ... this time. I was also thrilled to have my 2 megapixel iPhone with me, which takes pretty good shots.<br />
<a href="http://mark.veerman.com/gallery/cycling/emma_bike_curb"><img style="padding: 10px 0 0 0; clear: left;" src="http://mark.veerman.com/gallery/albums/cycling/emma_bike_curb.thumb.jpg" class="left" border="0" /></a><br />
<a href="http://mark.veerman.com/gallery/cycling/james_bike_nohand"><img style="padding: 10px 0 0 0; clear: left;" src="http://mark.veerman.com/gallery/albums/cycling/james_bike_nohand.thumb.jpg" class="left" border="0" /></a><br />
<div class="clearer"></div><br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Giant sand castle of suck</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mark.veerman.com/archives/2007/10/giant_sand_castle_of_suck.html" />
<modified>2007-10-17T20:29:34Z</modified>
<issued>2007-10-17T19:44:29Z</issued>
<id>tag:mark.veerman.com,2007://1.107</id>
<created>2007-10-17T19:44:29Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">So I just opened up Parallels to test a website on IE6, and was annoyed by the stupid little task-bar icon bubbles that pop up every time I login to Windows. You know, one&apos;s like &quot;Your computer might be at risk,&quot; and &quot;Your computer is out of date. Check for updates.&quot; I should probably do what they are asking me to do, but that&apos;s beside the point. Upon seeing their arrival for like the 50th time, this is what came out of my mouth,

&quot;That&apos;s just one of the many grains of sand that make Windows a giant sand castle of suck.&quot;

I know it&apos;s bad form to laugh at your own joke, and it&apos;s even worse to then blog about said joke, but I thought it was pretty funny. But then of course, maybe you had to be there. </summary>
<author>
<name>mark</name>

<email>mark@veerman.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>humor</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mark.veerman.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>So I just opened up Parallels to test a website on IE6, and was annoyed by the stupid little task-bar icon bubbles that pop up every time I login to Windows. You know, one's like "Your computer might be at risk," and "Your computer is out of date. Check for updates." I should probably do what they are asking me to do, but that's beside the point. Upon seeing their arrival for like the 50th time, this is what came out of my mouth,</p>

<p>"That's just one of the many grains of sand that make Windows a giant sand castle of suck."</p>

<p>I know it's bad form to laugh at your own joke, and it's even worse to then blog about said joke, but I thought it was pretty funny. But then of course, maybe you had to be there. </p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Amazon Mp3 store</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mark.veerman.com/archives/2007/10/amazon_mp3_stor.html" />
<modified>2007-10-09T13:38:55Z</modified>
<issued>2007-10-08T16:30:50Z</issued>
<id>tag:mark.veerman.com,2007://1.106</id>
<created>2007-10-08T16:30:50Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">If you&apos;re not living under a rock, you&apos;ll know that a couple weeks ago Amazon launched an mp3 store that portends to compete with Apple in the digital music sales arena. I was initially skeptical because the Apple store is easy to use and tightly integrated with iTunes.  You buy a song or TV show, and voila, it&apos;s in iTunes. The major difference between Apple and Amazon is that all songs purchased from Amazon are DRM free. Apple only sells some of their music without DRM, and I&apos;m not sure it&apos;s possible to tell which ones are and which ones aren&apos;t -- I have no idea. For many, DRM is completely transparent. If you purchase from the Apple store (into iTunes) and only ever listen on your laptop or sync to an Apple device,  then you&apos;ll never care about DRM. For me, I use a 3rd-party device that allows me to wirelessly stream music from my computer to my stereo.  This works great unless you have DRM protected music. The device I use doesn&apos;t support DRM. Whenever I purchased a new, DRM protected album from iTunes, I had to first rip it to a CD and then re-import it into iTunes as mp3 files in order to remove the DRM. I then felt compelled to keep around two copies of the album, the purchased DRM version and and the non-DRM version.  Needless to say, it was a pain.

As for my concern about ease of use and integration with iTunes, Amazon&apos;s service works great. You have to download and install an Amazon MP3 Downloader to help manage the download process. I&apos;m not entirely sure why this is necessary, but I&apos;m guessing it&apos;s to help ensure that your downloads were successfully downloaded, how many times they&apos;ve been downloaded, allow you to pause and restart, etc.  Since the Apple store is browsed only from within iTunes (read proprietary web browser), this sort of thing wasn&apos;t necessary. Since iTunes is such a good music player, none of us are mad that we have to use iTunes to browse their store. We weren&apos;t so happy when Microsoft did something similar with Internet Explorer, but I digress. Once the music is downloaded it&apos;s immediately available in iTunes, so integration with iTunes is seamless.

There were a few small hiccups with the store, but they weren&apos;t that big of a deal. After purchasing my first album, I tried to use the back button to browse for more albums and ended up downloading the album twice.  When this happened, the first time download of the album was still processing so I had plenty of time to cancel the accidental re-download. Surprisingly, there wasn&apos;t a way to delete queued downloads in the Amazon Mp3 Downloader, so I had to let it download and then manually delete the second copy of the songs. Also, the installer didn&apos;t register the amz extension with the currently open Firefox window; perhaps that isn&apos;t possible. On restart Firefox recognizes the new extension fine and correctly launches the downloader.

From this point forward, if Amazon has the album, I&apos;m going to purchase it there, I would suggest you do the same. If not, I&apos;ll still use iTunes. Oh yeah, just so Amazon gets the in the last word, many songs and albums are cheaper on Amazon. $0.89 cents a song versus $0.99 and $8.99 an album versus $9.99. The Crane Wife by The Decemberists was a full $2.00 cheaper.

[Update: If you enable iTunes Plus in the Apple store, you will always see the DRM free versions of songs/albums if available. The DRM free iTunes songs are more expensive individually at $1.29 a song, but it appears that you can still get the DRM free version of The Crane Wife through Apple for $9.99.]</summary>
<author>
<name>mark</name>

<email>mark@veerman.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>tech</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mark.veerman.com/">
<![CDATA[<p><img src="http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/nav2/images/skins/teal/logo-on._V46863482_.gif" class="left" />If you're not living under a rock, you'll know that a couple weeks ago Amazon launched an mp3 store that portends to compete with Apple in the digital music sales arena. I was initially skeptical because the Apple store is easy to use and tightly integrated with iTunes.  You buy a song or TV show, and voila, it's in iTunes. The major difference between Apple and Amazon is that all songs purchased from Amazon are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_rights_management">DRM</a> free. Apple only sells <em>some</em> of their music without DRM, and I'm not sure it's possible to tell which ones are and which ones aren't -- I have no idea. For many, DRM is completely transparent. If you purchase from the Apple store (into iTunes) and only ever listen on your laptop or sync to an Apple device,  then you'll never care about DRM. For me, I use a <a href="http://mark.veerman.com/archives/2005/11/squeezebox_netw.html">3rd-party device</a> that allows me to wirelessly stream music from my computer to my stereo.  This works great unless you have DRM protected music. The device I use doesn't support DRM. Whenever I purchased a new, DRM protected album from iTunes, I had to first rip it to a CD and then re-import it into iTunes as mp3 files in order to remove the DRM. I then felt compelled to keep around two copies of the album, the purchased DRM version and and the non-DRM version.  Needless to say, it was a pain.</p>

<p>As for my concern about ease of use and integration with iTunes, Amazon's service works great. You have to download and install an Amazon MP3 Downloader to help manage the download process. I'm not entirely sure why this is necessary, but I'm guessing it's to help ensure that your downloads were successfully downloaded, how many times they've been downloaded, allow you to pause and restart, etc.  Since the Apple store is browsed only from within iTunes (read proprietary web browser), this sort of thing wasn't necessary. Since iTunes is such a good music player, none of us are mad that we have to use iTunes to browse their store. We weren't so happy when Microsoft did something similar with Internet Explorer, but I digress. Once the music is downloaded it's immediately available in iTunes, so integration with iTunes is seamless.</p>

<p>There were a few small hiccups with the store, but they weren't that big of a deal. After purchasing my first album, I tried to use the back button to browse for more albums and ended up downloading the album twice.  When this happened, the first time download of the album was still processing so I had plenty of time to cancel the accidental re-download. Surprisingly, there wasn't a way to delete queued downloads in the Amazon Mp3 Downloader, so I had to let it download and then manually delete the second copy of the songs. Also, the installer didn't register the amz extension with the <em>currently open</em> Firefox window; perhaps that isn't possible. On restart Firefox recognizes the new extension fine and correctly launches the downloader.</p>

<p>From this point forward, if Amazon has the album, I'm going to purchase it there, I would suggest you do the same. If not, I'll still use iTunes. <strong>Oh yeah, just so Amazon gets the in the last word</strong>, many songs and albums are cheaper on Amazon. $0.89 cents a song versus $0.99 and $8.99 an album versus $9.99. <em>The Crane Wife</em> by The Decemberists was a full $2.00 cheaper.</p>

<p><b>[Update: If you enable <em>iTunes Plus</em> in the Apple store, you will always see the DRM free versions of songs/albums if available. The DRM free iTunes songs are more expensive individually at $1.29 a song, but it appears that you can still get the DRM free version of <em>The Crane Wife</em> through Apple for $9.99.]</b></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Eighteen year old children?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mark.veerman.com/archives/2007/10/eighteen_year_o.html" />
<modified>2007-10-04T13:27:27Z</modified>
<issued>2007-10-04T12:14:17Z</issued>
<id>tag:mark.veerman.com,2007://1.105</id>
<created>2007-10-04T12:14:17Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Thanks to a friend, I was able to attend the UVA vs. Pitt college football game this past Saturday.  The game was awesome and has absolutely nothing to do with this post. While walking back to the car with the throngs of people after the game, I saw two completely wasted college girls standing on the road next to the curb.  I&apos;m quite liberal with the word drunk.  I can drink two beers on an empty stomach and will joke that I&apos;m drunk.  I don&apos;t use the word wasted lightly.  These girls could hardly stand. At one point, while trying to stand still, they managed to be tripped by the curb and both fell ungracefully backwards onto the sidewalk. One of them was talking on a cell phone and simultaneously trying to flag down cars. She managed to get about 2 cars to stop in the 30 seconds I was walking by.  These girls were both cute and wearing short skirts. It was like watching a CNN headlines abduction story unfolding. As a typical American, I watched it like reality television, and did nothing -- subliminally I&apos;m sure I was thinking about getting some chips and salsa. Regardless, I&apos;m about to segue into something only marginally related.

What&apos;s up with the legal drinking age being 21?  We&apos;ve all heard the age-old complaint of most sub-twenty-oners, &quot;I can die for my country and can&apos;t buy a beer, what&apos;s up with that!&quot; We treat our college students like children and then expect them to act like adults. I&apos;m not saying that if we move the drinking age to 18 that it will mature this age group overnight, but I think we have to do it. It&apos;s one step to solving a much deeper problem of lowered expectations and standards. Our society doesn&apos;t really expect our 18-20 year olds to make wise, intelligent decisions -- heck we don&apos;t even expect most people to make good decisions.  Eighteen year olds are adults -- In truth, most 13 year olds are adults.  We&apos;ve coddled our children so much in this country. They were doomed to make poor decisions the first time we gave in to a fit in order to keep them quiet. When we failed to teach them delayed gratification by spoiling them in the name of love. When we failed to model appropriate adult behavior. We need to raise our expectations for good behavior and start being surprised again by bad behavior. At the very least, I will hold my kids to a standard that should make them stand out amongst their peers, even if I only partially succeed.

I should point out that my children&apos;s behavior is not a point of pride. If my son is anything like me, and my daughter is anything like my wife than we&apos;re in for a roller-coaster adolescence. I even thought twice about using the word adolescence. Implicit in that is the notion of not quite an adult; and possibly lowered standards for their behavior. My 4 year old daughter and 6 year old son are already capable of adult-like manners (not that we don&apos;t constantly need to remind them).  Regardless, I think we should expect great things, and try to prepare them for those great things as best we can.

Next week, I&apos;ll vent about the government requiring adults to wear seatbelts, and my tax dollars paying for public service ads about getting fat people to take the stairs instead of the elevator.</summary>
<author>
<name>mark</name>

<email>mark@veerman.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>random</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mark.veerman.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>Thanks to a friend, I was able to attend the UVA vs. Pitt college football game this past Saturday.  The game was awesome and has absolutely nothing to do with this post. While walking back to the car with the throngs of people after the game, I saw two completely <em>wasted</em> college girls standing on the road next to the curb.  I'm quite liberal with the word drunk.  I can drink two beers on an empty stomach and will joke that I'm drunk.  I don't use the word wasted lightly.  These girls could hardly stand. At one point, while trying to stand still, they managed to be tripped by the curb and both fell ungracefully backwards onto the sidewalk. One of them was talking on a cell phone and simultaneously trying to flag down cars. She managed to get about 2 cars to stop in the 30 seconds I was walking by.  These girls were both cute and wearing short skirts. It was like watching a CNN headlines abduction story unfolding. As a typical American, I watched it like reality television, and did nothing -- subliminally I'm sure I was thinking about getting some chips and salsa. Regardless, I'm about to segue into something only marginally related.</p>

<p>What's up with the legal drinking age being 21?  We've all heard the age-old complaint of most sub-twenty-oners, "I can die for my country and can't buy a beer, what's up with that!" We treat our college students like children and then expect them to act like adults. I'm not saying that if we move the drinking age to 18 that it will mature this age group overnight, but I think we have to do it. It's one step to solving a much deeper problem of lowered expectations and standards. Our society doesn't <em>really expect</em> our 18-20 year olds to make wise, intelligent decisions -- heck we don't even expect most people to make good decisions.  <strong>Eighteen year olds are adults</strong> -- In truth, most 13 year olds are adults.  We've coddled our children so much in this country. They were doomed to make poor decisions the first time we gave in to a fit in order to keep them quiet. When we failed to teach them delayed gratification by spoiling them in the name of love. When we failed to model appropriate adult behavior. We need to raise our expectations for good behavior and start being surprised again by bad behavior. At the very least, I will hold <strong>my</strong> kids to a standard that should make them stand out amongst their peers, even if I only partially succeed.</p>

<p>I should point out that my children's behavior is not a point of pride. If my son is anything like me, and my daughter is anything like my wife than we're in for a roller-coaster adolescence. I even thought twice about using the word adolescence. Implicit in that is the notion of <em>not quite an adult</em>; and possibly lowered standards for their behavior. My 4 year old daughter and 6 year old son are already <em>capable</em> of adult-like manners (not that we don't constantly need to remind them).  Regardless, I think we should expect great things, and try to prepare them for those great things as best we can.</p>

<p>Next week, I'll vent about the government requiring adults to wear seatbelts, and my tax dollars paying for public service ads about getting fat people to take the stairs instead of the elevator.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Dale&apos;s Pale Ale, cans, and a Budweiser nod</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mark.veerman.com/archives/2007/09/dales_pale_ale.html" />
<modified>2007-10-22T16:39:16Z</modified>
<issued>2007-09-24T21:31:45Z</issued>
<id>tag:mark.veerman.com,2007://1.104</id>
<created>2007-09-24T21:31:45Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Back in the early days of my beer snobbery, I looked at canned beer with disdain.  You just can&apos;t appreciate the inner beauty of a beer when it&apos;s served in such a common container.  A bottle or pint glass was the only acceptable delivery mechanism.  Perhaps I&apos;ve sold out, perhaps I&apos;ve matured; regardless, all that now .

A while ago I discovered Dale&apos;s Pale Ale (DPA), brewed by the Oskar Blues Cajun Grill and Brewery in Lyons, CO, and as you intelligent (or sober) readers have guessed, it comes in a can. The can takes absolutely nothing away from the experience. I&apos;m going to go so far as to say that the can actually enhances the experience. DPA is awesome, and very drinkable.

If I&apos;ve lost any credibility, I&apos;m about to lose more.  My father in law drinks Budweiser, mostly in a bottle but often in a can.  I&apos;ve come to appreciate not only the beer, but especially the can. Perhaps because he&apos;s an ex-Marine (if there is such a thing as ex), and he owns a rifle (you&apos;re not allowed to say gun to a Marine trust me), but mostly because of it&apos;s drinkability. Perhaps I should defend myself. Budweiser does in fact taste like Budweiser.  It&apos;s not as tasteless as some of my peeps would argue.  It is a mass produced beer intended to appeal to, well, the whole world, so it&apos;s certainly pretty simple.  However, I could pick Budweiser out of a hidden taste test every time, and have actually come to like it;  It&apos;s really not that bad, and on certain occasions is perfect. Just don&apos;t get me started on &apos;light beers.&apos; Moving on to the can -- I think it&apos;s easier to take a pull from a can.  There, I&apos;ve said it. It&apos;s easier to drink from a can. There&apos;s something satisfactorily innate in drinking beer out of a can, especially when it&apos;s good beer like DPA.

It used to be that the can imparted a metallic taste to it&apos;s inhabiter, but I think that chemistry and manufacturing have caught up with this one. Whatever it is that they are lining their cans with, just works. DPA tastes as good as if it came from a bottle. About the only danger is that it&apos;s so good and drinkable, they tend to go down fast. Actually, here&apos;s what the Oskar Blues folks say on their website with regard to the can&apos;s coating:

&quot;But then we discovered that the belief that cans impart flavor to beer is a myth. The modern-day aluminum can and its lid are lined with a water-based coating, so the beer and the can never touch. Cans, we discovered, are actually good for beer. Cans keep beer especially fresh by fully protecting it from light and oxygen. Our cans also hold extremely low amounts of dissolved oxygen, so our beer stays especially fresh for longer. Cans are also easier to recycle and less fuel-consuming to ship.&quot;

I&apos;m not really sure about the &apos;myth&apos; part, since I cseem to recall metallic tasting beer, but it seems to work for them. Ummm, I guess that&apos;s it. Please forgive the glut of superlatives, they are complements of DPA ... hic!?</summary>
<author>
<name>mark</name>

<email>mark@veerman.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>brewing</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mark.veerman.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>Back in the early days of my beer snobbery, I looked at canned beer with disdain.  You just can't appreciate the <i>inner beauty</i> of a beer when it's served in such a common container.  A bottle or pint glass was the only acceptable delivery mechanism.  Perhaps I've sold out, perhaps I've matured; regardless, all that now .</p>

<p><img src="http://mark.veerman.com/images/dales_pale_ale.jpg" class="left">A while ago I discovered <a href="http://www.oskarblues.com/brew/">Dale's Pale Ale</a> (DPA), brewed by the Oskar Blues Cajun Grill and Brewery in Lyons, CO, and as you intelligent (or sober) readers have guessed, it comes in a can. The can takes absolutely nothing away from the experience. I'm going to go so far as to say that the can actually enhances the experience. DPA is awesome, and very drinkable.</p>

<p>If I've lost any credibility, I'm about to lose more.  My father in law drinks Budweiser, mostly in a bottle but often in a can.  I've come to appreciate not only the beer, but especially the can. Perhaps because he's an ex-Marine (if there is such a thing as <i>ex</i>), and he owns a rifle (you're not allowed to say gun to a Marine <i>trust me</i>), but mostly because of it's drinkability. Perhaps I should defend myself. Budweiser does in fact taste like Budweiser.  It's not as tasteless as some of my peeps would argue.  It is a mass produced beer intended to appeal to, well, <em>the whole world</em>, so it's certainly pretty simple.  However, I could pick Budweiser out of a hidden taste test every time, and have actually come to like it;  It's really not that bad, and on certain occasions is perfect. Just don't get me started on 'light beers.' Moving on to the can -- I think it's easier to <em>take a pull</em> from a can.  There, I've said it. It's easier to drink from a can. There's something satisfactorily innate in drinking beer out of a can, especially when it's <em>good</em> beer like DPA.</p>

<p>It used to be that the can imparted a metallic taste to it's inhabiter, but I think that chemistry and manufacturing have caught up with this one. Whatever it is that they are lining their cans with, just works. DPA tastes as good as if it came from a bottle. About the only danger is that it's so good and drinkable, they tend to go down fast. Actually, here's what the Oskar Blues folks say on their website with regard to the can's coating:</p>

<p>"But then we discovered that the belief that cans impart flavor to beer is a myth. The modern-day aluminum can and its lid are lined with a water-based coating, so the beer and the can never touch. Cans, we discovered, are actually good for beer. Cans keep beer especially fresh by fully protecting it from light and oxygen. Our cans also hold extremely low amounts of dissolved oxygen, so our beer stays especially fresh for longer. Cans are also easier to recycle and less fuel-consuming to ship."</p>

<p>I'm not really sure about the 'myth' part, since I cseem to recall metallic tasting beer, but it seems to work for them. Ummm, I guess that's it. Please forgive the glut of superlatives, they are complements of DPA ... hic!?</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>25th Annual Shenandoah Valley Century</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mark.veerman.com/archives/2007/09/25th_annual_she.html" />
<modified>2007-09-21T13:58:13Z</modified>
<issued>2007-09-10T16:33:08Z</issued>
<id>tag:mark.veerman.com,2007://1.103</id>
<created>2007-09-10T16:33:08Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">At the risk of turning this blog into a one-trick pony, I&apos;m going to post yet again about biking.

When I initially decide to ride in the Shenandoah Mountain 100, I noticed that the 25th annual Shenandoah Valley Century was happening the following weekend. I decided then that it would be cool to see if I could complete two 100 mile events back to back. I didn&apos;t want to commit to the road century until 1. I finished the first event, and 2. recovered enough to ride another 100 miles. Thankfully, I did manage to finish the mountain century, and by mid-week, I felt recovered enough to give it a shot.

My only goal for the day was to beat last year&apos;s time.  I finished in 7 hours and averaged 16.8 mph (up from 15.1 mph last year). At the end of the race I felt a lot stronger than last year. I improved 20 minutes from last year&apos;s finish time.  I thought I would have made up more than 20 minutes given the faster average speed, but I&apos;m guessing I must have stayed a few minutes longer at each rest stop.

There were approximately 300 people racing that day. This picture was taken at the start of the race. As you can see, I managed to be the last guy to start on time.  I&apos;m sure there were some additional stragglers who started late. It was a lot of fun.

I did keep a sharp eye out for lightening bolts, as this was the second subsequent Sunday I&apos;ve missed church to participate in a biking event.</summary>
<author>
<name>mark</name>

<email>mark@veerman.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>cycling</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mark.veerman.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>At the risk of turning this blog into a one-trick pony, I'm going to post yet again about biking.</p>

<p>When I initially decide to ride in the <a href="http://mark.veerman.com/archives/2007/09/shenandoah_moun_1.html">Shenandoah Mountain 100</a>, I noticed that the <a href="http://svbikeclub.org">25th annual Shenandoah Valley Century</a> was happening the following weekend. I decided then that it would be cool to see if I could complete two 100 mile events back to back. I didn't want to commit to the road century until 1. I finished the first event, and 2. recovered enough to ride another 100 miles. Thankfully, I did manage to finish the mountain century, and by mid-week, I felt recovered enough to give it a shot.</p>

<p><a href="http://mark.veerman.com/gallery/cycling/Mark_Crazed_with_Century_Excitement"><img border="0" src="http://mark.veerman.com/gallery/albums/cycling/Mark_Crazed_with_Century_Excitement.thumb.jpg"/ class="left"></a>My only goal for the day was to beat <a href="http://mark.veerman.com/archives/2006/09/svbc_century.html">last year's time</a>.  I finished in 7 hours and averaged 16.8 mph (up from 15.1 mph last year). At the end of the race I felt a lot stronger than last year. I improved 20 minutes from last year's finish time.  I thought I would have made up more than 20 minutes given the faster average speed, but I'm guessing I must have stayed a few minutes longer at each rest stop.</p>

<p>There were approximately 300 people racing that day. This picture was taken at the start of the race. As you can see, I managed to be the last guy to start on time.  I'm sure there were some additional stragglers who started late. It was a lot of fun.</p>

<p>I did keep a sharp eye out for lightening bolts, as this was the second subsequent Sunday I've missed church to participate in a biking event.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

</feed>